So today the Food Forests Across America program was launched. I am having mixed feelings about this. By that I mean that I am really happy and excited that the sustainable gardening and food production movement is spreading further and further, but I am also a little put off by the fact it's Forest Gardening that is getting the spotlight.
Permaculture and Forest Gardening are seen as distinctly different things, especially by those who have learned and bought into Forest Gardening before even hearing about Permaculture. Food Forest advocates have gone as far as to create charts listing the different methods of growing techniques from Agriculture to Food Forestry, putting Food Forests at the very top and Permaculture somewhere in the high mid-range. Permaculture advocates see it differently, stating that Forest Gardening is merely a strategy to design by using the companion planting, analogue and accelerated succession techniques. This differing point of view does not necessarily make for good bedfellows.
Food Forestry, or Edible Forest Gardening, was pioneered by Robert Hart in Shropshire, England. Permaculture was founded by Bill Mollison in Australia. Both have had other authors expound upon the subjects at length through many different books and workshops. So what's the big deal? Well, for one Permaculture is older than Forest Gardening. I would be hard pressed to believe that there isn't just a little bit of Mollison's work in Hart's design system, seeing that Hart openly said he was using a companion planting method. The other thing getting me all riled up is the simple fact Permaculture is a more developed and effective system than Forest Gardening, being able to work in many more environments and with a higher level of yield through time.
Still, Forest Gardening is the current buzz and I guess I can't complain too much. It's easier to imagine, more romantic in it's name and certainly has a better marketing system behind it. Little steps are better than no steps I guess.
Permaculture and Forest Gardening are seen as distinctly different things, especially by those who have learned and bought into Forest Gardening before even hearing about Permaculture. Food Forest advocates have gone as far as to create charts listing the different methods of growing techniques from Agriculture to Food Forestry, putting Food Forests at the very top and Permaculture somewhere in the high mid-range. Permaculture advocates see it differently, stating that Forest Gardening is merely a strategy to design by using the companion planting, analogue and accelerated succession techniques. This differing point of view does not necessarily make for good bedfellows.
Food Forestry, or Edible Forest Gardening, was pioneered by Robert Hart in Shropshire, England. Permaculture was founded by Bill Mollison in Australia. Both have had other authors expound upon the subjects at length through many different books and workshops. So what's the big deal? Well, for one Permaculture is older than Forest Gardening. I would be hard pressed to believe that there isn't just a little bit of Mollison's work in Hart's design system, seeing that Hart openly said he was using a companion planting method. The other thing getting me all riled up is the simple fact Permaculture is a more developed and effective system than Forest Gardening, being able to work in many more environments and with a higher level of yield through time.
Still, Forest Gardening is the current buzz and I guess I can't complain too much. It's easier to imagine, more romantic in it's name and certainly has a better marketing system behind it. Little steps are better than no steps I guess.





